On 10.12.04 Torsten Werner (email@twerner42.de) wrote:
Moin,
ich wette dafür gibt es eine Lösung:
Ich habe ein Paket removed unter Mißachtung der Abhängigkeiten (dpkg -r --force-depends $packet).
Was genau ist die Ausgabe von
apt-get install -f
?
apt-get install -f tfm-arphic-bsmi00lp :
Reading Package Lists... Building Dependency Tree... You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these: The following packages have unmet dependencies: cjk-latex: Depends: tetex-base (>= 1.0-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: tetex-bin (>= 1.0.6-1.1) but it is not going to be installed tfm-arphic-bsmi00lp: Depends: tetex-bin but it is not going to be installed E: Unmet dependencies. Try 'apt-get -f install' with no packages (or specify a solution).
apt-get install -f :
Reading Package Lists... Building Dependency Tree... Correcting dependencies... Done The following extra packages will be installed: tetex-base tetex-bin Suggested packages: tetex-extra lpr Recommended packages: tetex-doc texi2html perl-tk The following NEW packages will be installed: tetex-base tetex-bin The following held packages will be changed: tetex-base tetex-bin 0 upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/18.3MB of archives. After unpacking 63.5MB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] Abort.
Dann baut er mir teTeX rauf, aber genau das will ich nicht.
H.
P.S.: Wo wir gerade dabei sind: In den Skripten von tfm-arphic-bsmi00lp sind die Pfade zu Programmen wie mktexlsr hart kodiert. Ist das OK oder einen Bug Report wert?