Am Montag, dem 21. Oktober 2002 um 08:23:00, schrieb Thomas Guettler:

Gibt es bei ext3 immer einen so großen Overhead?

Nein (siehe hda5):

# parted GNU Parted 1.4.24 Copyright (C) 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This program is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License.

This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details.

Using /dev/hda Information: The operating system thinks the geometry on /dev/hda is 5005/255/63. Therefore, cylinder 1024 ends at 8032.499M. (parted) p Disk geometry for /dev/hda: 0.000-39266.718 megabytes Disk label type: msdos Minor Start End Type Filesystem Flags 2 0.031 478.498 primary linux-swap 3 478.499 2431.713 primary ntfs boot 1 10017.092 39260.412 extended lba 5 10017.123 19555.686 logical ext3 6 19555.717 29996.367 logical ntfs (parted) q # df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/hda5 9.2G 4.2G 4.9G 46% / vwisb7:/home 148G 112G 35G 76% /var/autofs/misc/home

Die Partition wurde mit "mkfs.ext3 /dev/hdb2" erstellt.

Merkwürdig.

Torsten